STPDE: Future applications : Différence entre versions
(→Our goal) |
(→Submitter's role: coordination) |
||
| Ligne 18 : | Ligne 18 : | ||
===State of the art=== | ===State of the art=== | ||
===Technological barriers=== | ===Technological barriers=== | ||
| − | ===Submitter's role: coordination=== | + | ===Submitter's role: coordination=== |
| + | |||
| + | Ynternet.org scientific committee is gathering renown experts with result-oriented successful micro-entrepreneurs, all experienced on managing societal transitions for your public or private organization. Our reason to be is described in one single key word : netizenship, alias citizenship on the net. | ||
| + | We can co-design and co-garden working groups with the right people in key communities of the emerging Netizen culture. We can manage partnerships with local as well as worlwide leaders of successful projects and movements. Some symbols : GNU/Linux, Firefox, CreativeCommons, Wikipedia. But also projects on Netsafety, eLearning, FreeHardware DYI movements, alternative currency webprojects, MOOCs. | ||
| + | |||
=== Funding the grand challenge work=== | === Funding the grand challenge work=== | ||
===Additional background material=== | ===Additional background material=== | ||
Version du 21 mars 2016 à 18:32
Sommaire
The socio-technical properties of digital environments as a defined measurable and verifiable goal
Learning from the AlphaGo
In March 2016, AlphaGo beat Lee Sedol in a five-game match, continuing the long tradition of machines learning from, competing and surpassing humans. Is it about time for humans to learn from "computers and networks" or, else, computer and network mediated environments.
Digital environments
A digital ecosystem is a distributed, adaptive, open socio-technical system with properties of self-organisation, scalability and sustainability inspired from natural ecosystems. Digital ecosystem models are informed by knowledge of natural ecosystems, especially for aspects related to competition and collaboration among diverse entities.
Our goal
How to better understand the underlying technical and social factors that underpin individual and organizational behaviors in the field of digital environments? If all indicators are modular and variable, how scientific-solid grounds could be used to anticipate future of the Internet and other related digital trends? What are the socio-technical properties of digital environments? How can they be rethought and reused in everyday life activities? What are their future applications for business, cooperatives, entrepreneurs?
We propose (five) 5 key invariant socio-technical indicators enabling qualitative and quantitative assessments of past, present and future trends in digital environments. Our challenge is to overpass the state of intuitive guess, through complexity management approaches, no matter if it's top-down (with mixing theoretical experts and grass-root activists) or bottom-up (with application of wisdom of crowds). We propose to assess whether digital environments possess properties, somehow like water do possess properties (freezing at 0 C°, evaporating at 100 C°).
Measuring the goal
Success metrics
State of the art
Technological barriers
Submitter's role: coordination
Ynternet.org scientific committee is gathering renown experts with result-oriented successful micro-entrepreneurs, all experienced on managing societal transitions for your public or private organization. Our reason to be is described in one single key word : netizenship, alias citizenship on the net. We can co-design and co-garden working groups with the right people in key communities of the emerging Netizen culture. We can manage partnerships with local as well as worlwide leaders of successful projects and movements. Some symbols : GNU/Linux, Firefox, CreativeCommons, Wikipedia. But also projects on Netsafety, eLearning, FreeHardware DYI movements, alternative currency webprojects, MOOCs.
